Make vs n8n
Both tools are listed under No-Code Marketing Workflow Automation, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.
Make
Visual workflow orchestration platform connecting APIs, databases, and AI agents through a node-based integration engine.
Pricing: Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce (Web SaaS)
n8n
Source-available node-based workflow automation platform combining deterministic API routing with AI-driven multi-agent orchestration for marketing.
Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B SaaS (Web SaaS)
How Make and n8n differ
- Pricing model: Make is freemium, n8n is enterprise / quote.
- Make has a free plan; none is recorded for n8n.
- Headquarters: Make in Prague, Praha 8, n8n in United States.
Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.
Side-by-side facts
| Field | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Subtrack | No-Code Marketing Workflow Automation | No-Code Marketing Workflow Automation |
| Pricing | Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan | Custom / enterprise pricing |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Enterprise / quote |
| Free access | Free plan | No free plan disclosed |
| Enterprise plan | Yes | Yes |
| AI autonomy level | L3 · Conditional automation | L3 · Conditional automation |
| Moat tier | Proprietary moat | Proprietary moat |
| Delivery | Web SaaS | Web SaaS |
| Audience | B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce | B2B SaaS |
| Headquarters | Prague, Praha 8 | United States |
| Fact-checked | Julie Brot, Oct 14, 2026 | Vasilia Xia, Oct 15, 2026 |
Make vs n8n: TCO & constraint stress test
Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.
Make
Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Make does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Make publishes a transparent entry point (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan) with a free tier for initial validation before committing.
- Tier Fit for 5-Seat Scale: Entry / Starter ($12/mo): Verified $12/mo published rate on vendor pricing schedule.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: High-Throughput Operational Throttling: Complex multi-branch scenarios experience execution queue latency and downstream API rate-limiting when handling high-frequency webhook bursts, requiring manual batching logic.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan entry plan without upgrading tiers.
Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Make's Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.
n8n
High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: n8n does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes, with custom enterprise tiers structured around organizational scale, user seats, and workflow volume.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Memory Overhead: High-volume execution pipelines processing large binary payloads or batched records risk node memory leaks, requiring external queue management via Redis.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (n8n requires sales-gated custom quoting).
Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the n8n order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.
Limitations
Make
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: High-Throughput Operational Throttling: Complex multi-branch scenarios experience execution queue latency and downstream API rate-limiting when handling high-frequency webhook bursts, requiring manual batching logic.Full limitations in the Make review
n8n
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Memory Overhead: High-volume execution pipelines processing large binary payloads or batched records risk node memory leaks, requiring external queue management via Redis.Full limitations in the n8n review
Pricing notes
Make: Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan
Commercial procurement follows a tiered usage framework anchored by operations consumed across scenario runs. Evaluation commences on an entry-level tier at $0 per month, which supplies foundational execution credits and connector access for exploratory workflows.Pricing details in the Make review
n8n: Custom / enterprise pricing
Pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes, with custom enterprise tiers structured around organizational scale, user seats, and workflow volume.Pricing details in the n8n review
Frequently asked questions: Make vs n8n
How does Make pricing compare to n8n in 2026?
Make is listed at Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan (freemium, free plan), whereas n8n is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed).
How do Make and n8n compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?
On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Make is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.6/5.0), while n8n is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.6/5.0).
Which teams are Make and n8n built for?
Make is a Web SaaS product in No-Code Marketing Workflow Automation designed for B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce. n8n is a Web SaaS product in No-Code Marketing Workflow Automation designed for B2B SaaS.
What are the main limitations of Make vs n8n?
For Make: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: High-Throughput Operational Throttling: Complex multi-branch scenarios experience execution queue latency and downstream API rate-limiting when handling high-frequency webhook bursts, requiring manual batching logic. For n8n: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Memory Overhead: High-volume execution pipelines processing large binary payloads or batched records risk node memory leaks, requiring external queue management via Redis.
Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 15, 2026.