Actively AI vs Gravity
Actively AI is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs and Gravity under Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.
Actively AI
Autonomous revenue orchestration platform deploying dedicated per-account AI agents to automate account-based research, pipeline generation, and customer.
Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 4.2/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
Gravity
Autonomous go-to-market agent platform acting as a directive revenue chief of staff to replace passive CRM data entry with proactive sales execution.
Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.8/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams (Web SaaS)
How Actively AI and Gravity differ
- Actively AI is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs; Gravity under Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers.
- Actively AI was founded earlier (2022) than Gravity (2025).
- Headquarters: Actively AI in New York City, NY, Gravity in Boulder, Colorado.
- Audience: Actively AI targets B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps); Gravity targets GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams.
Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.
Side-by-side facts
| Field | Actively AI | Gravity |
|---|---|---|
| Subtrack | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs | Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers |
| Pricing | Custom / enterprise pricing | Custom / enterprise pricing |
| Pricing model | Enterprise / quote | Enterprise / quote |
| Free access | No free plan disclosed | No free plan disclosed |
| Enterprise plan | Yes | Yes |
| AI autonomy level | L3 · Conditional automation | L3 · Conditional automation |
| Moat tier | Proprietary moat | Proprietary moat |
| Delivery | Web SaaS | Web SaaS |
| Audience | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) | GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY | Boulder, Colorado |
| Fact-checked | Jagmeet Sine, Oct 12, 2026 | Tim Fenolz, Oct 11, 2026 |
Actively AI vs Gravity: TCO & constraint stress test
Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.
Actively AI
High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Actively AI does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Actively AI operates an enterprise commercial model where pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Actively AI requires sales-gated custom quoting).
Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Actively AI order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.
Gravity
High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Gravity does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Gravity provides custom enterprise licensing structured around organizational scale and user seats.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Gravity requires sales-gated custom quoting).
Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Gravity order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.
Limitations
Actively AI
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences.Full limitations in the Actively AI review
Gravity
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.Full limitations in the Gravity review
Pricing notes
Actively AI: Custom / enterprise pricing
Actively AI operates an enterprise commercial model where pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.Pricing details in the Actively AI review
Gravity: Custom / enterprise pricing
Gravity provides custom enterprise licensing structured around organizational scale and user seats.Pricing details in the Gravity review
Frequently asked questions: Actively AI vs Gravity
How does Actively AI pricing compare to Gravity in 2026?
Actively AI is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed), whereas Gravity is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed).
How do Actively AI and Gravity compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?
On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Actively AI is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (4.2/5.0), while Gravity is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.8/5.0).
Which teams are Actively AI and Gravity built for?
Actively AI is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Gravity is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers designed for GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams.
What are the main limitations of Actively AI vs Gravity?
For Actively AI: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences. For Gravity: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.
Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 12, 2026.