Actively AI vs Gravity

Actively AI is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs and Gravity under Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.

Actively AI

Autonomous revenue orchestration platform deploying dedicated per-account AI agents to automate account-based research, pipeline generation, and customer.

Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 4.2/5.0 (Proprietary moat)

Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)

Read the Actively AI review

Gravity

Autonomous go-to-market agent platform acting as a directive revenue chief of staff to replace passive CRM data entry with proactive sales execution.

Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.8/5.0 (Proprietary moat)

Target fit: GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams (Web SaaS)

Read the Gravity review

How Actively AI and Gravity differ

  • Actively AI is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs; Gravity under Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers.
  • Actively AI was founded earlier (2022) than Gravity (2025).
  • Headquarters: Actively AI in New York City, NY, Gravity in Boulder, Colorado.
  • Audience: Actively AI targets B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps); Gravity targets GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams.

Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.

Side-by-side facts

FieldActively AIGravity
SubtrackAutonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRsAutonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers
PricingCustom / enterprise pricingCustom / enterprise pricing
Pricing modelEnterprise / quoteEnterprise / quote
Free accessNo free plan disclosedNo free plan disclosed
Enterprise planYesYes
AI autonomy levelL3 · Conditional automationL3 · Conditional automation
Moat tierProprietary moatProprietary moat
DeliveryWeb SaaSWeb SaaS
AudienceB2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps)GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams
HeadquartersNew York City, NYBoulder, Colorado
Fact-checkedJagmeet Sine, Oct 12, 2026Tim Fenolz, Oct 11, 2026
AI Head-to-Head Procurement Simulator · Evidence-Locked Dossier

Actively AI vs Gravity: TCO & constraint stress test

Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.

1. Team / Seat Scale
2. Monthly Budget Ceiling
3. Primary Stack
4. Guardrail
At 5 seats and a $800/mo ceiling, both Actively AI and Gravity land in the same risk band (High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch).

Actively AI

High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Enterprise / Custom)Custom Quote (Custom / enterprise pricing)Vendor does not publish a self-serve USD floor on its pricing page; requires sales qualification.Sales-gated pricing vs. $800/mo cap (High quote risk)
  • Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Actively AI does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
  • Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Actively AI operates an enterprise commercial model where pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Actively AI requires sales-gated custom quoting).

Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Actively AI order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.

Gravity

High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Enterprise / Custom)Custom Quote (Custom / enterprise pricing)Vendor does not publish a self-serve USD floor on its pricing page; requires sales qualification.Sales-gated pricing vs. $800/mo cap (High quote risk)
  • Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Gravity does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
  • Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Gravity provides custom enterprise licensing structured around organizational scale and user seats.
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Gravity requires sales-gated custom quoting).

Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Gravity order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.

Interactive Head-to-Head Scenario Red-Teamer · Fact-Gate Verified

Limitations

Actively AI

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences.
Full limitations in the Actively AI review

Gravity

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.
Full limitations in the Gravity review

Pricing notes

Actively AI: Custom / enterprise pricing

Actively AI operates an enterprise commercial model where pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.
Pricing details in the Actively AI review

Gravity: Custom / enterprise pricing

Gravity provides custom enterprise licensing structured around organizational scale and user seats.
Pricing details in the Gravity review

Frequently asked questions: Actively AI vs Gravity

How does Actively AI pricing compare to Gravity in 2026?

Actively AI is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed), whereas Gravity is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed).

How do Actively AI and Gravity compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?

On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Actively AI is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (4.2/5.0), while Gravity is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.8/5.0).

Which teams are Actively AI and Gravity built for?

Actively AI is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Gravity is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous Marketing Agents & Digital Coworkers designed for GTM Operations Teams, Enterprise Marketing Executives, Automated Ops Teams.

What are the main limitations of Actively AI vs Gravity?

For Actively AI: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Context Graph Drift: Agents risk synthesizing obsolete organizational hierarchies if target accounts undergo rapid executive turnover that outpaces external data refresh cadences. For Gravity: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema Mapping Brittleness: Complex, heavily customized Salesforce or HubSpot object schemas require extensive field-level mapping, creating operational fragility during upstream property changes.

Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 12, 2026.